Should supreme court judges be on the court for life. Does not provide for the necessity that a court justice resign after a certain. Fully implemented that arrangement. Proponents suggest an 18 year term followed by if the justice wishes service on a lower court to honor the constitutional promise of good behavior tenure.
The economist has suggested that such a step is needed. Ability of court justices to hold office during good behavior and. Since supreme court justices serve for life such a turn of events would tilt the court toward conservative rulings for decades.
Any vacancy now will be a cataclysmic event both because the nation and the court itself are so closely yet deeply divided and because with life tenure the justices now routinely serve for 25 to 30 years. Yessupreme court justices should serve for lifethis gives them a kind of neutrality that is supposed to make them immune to political pressure although this is not always the casesome people want supreme court justices to be elected but this would totally jeopardize their neutrality and prevent them from really doing their job. Supreme court rules judges might serve for life but not eternity in order for a vote to count a judge must be actively serving on the court when a ruling is rendered the supreme court said.
Instead the document addresses the. Term limits might bring the courts opinions closer to the people. There is no other supreme court in any state or foreign country whose judges have life tenure.
Constitution provides for the lifetime appointment of every supreme court justice though not through any direct language. The point of giving justices a seat on the bench for the rest of their lives or more commonly nowadays until they decide to retire is to shield the nations highest court from the kind of. Most courts have mandatory retirement ages or the justices serve for fixed terms.
Https Encrypted Tbn0 Gstatic Com Images Q Tbn 3aand9gcr4 Dx545zctsxhhw9rb Nnsbjuimxuzcgfbcefvav Yyx8brqi Usqp Cau
encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com